Search

 

Health landscape report: 8 June – 12 June

  • Latest news

This weekly report shares new data and policy information relating to general practice, with selected facts and figures highlighted.

This report is a flexible summary, with the aim of sharing and highlighting a wide range of data and policy information relating to London general practice published in a given week. Where we view information to be of significant interest it is reproduced directly below the links to make the key points quicker to digest.  

Please feel free to share any useful stats/links you think we could include in future reports.  

Official bodies    

NHS Digital 

Department of Health and Social Care 

UK Health Security Agency 

Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency 

Cross-party Science, Innovation and Technology Committee 

BMA 

UK Parliament 

  • Report: Rewiring the state: Delivering digital government [3/6]. 
    • The committee says digital transformation should focus on improving public services, efficiency and resilience, rather than being driven by hype around AI and new technologies or unproven claims of savings. 
    • MPs warn that government is becoming too dependent on a small number of major suppliers, particularly Palantir, Microsoft and AWS, creating risks around vendor lock-in, digital sovereignty and long-term resilience. 
    • The report calls for greater in-house digital capability, stronger scrutiny of technology investments, and more support for UK-based alternatives, including replacing the NHS Federated Data Platform’s current Palantir contract when the 2027 break clause is reached. 
  • Report: Supporting people with frailty outside hospitals [3/6]. 
    • GPs are not assessing as many people for frailty as they should be doing, assessing 17% of those aged 65 and over in 2024-25. 
    • Those diagnosed with frailty are not getting follow-up assessments from GPs, only 16% got a medication review and 18% a falls risk assessment. 

Policy, think tanks, charities, and representative bodies  

The King’s Fund 

  • Merging the permanent secretary and NHS chief executive roles: ‘a major mistake’? [12/6].  
  • This blog argues strongly against proposals to merge the roles of Department of Health permanent secretary and NHS chief executive, warning that past experience shows it would be a mistake. Drawing on the early 2000s, when the roles were briefly combined, it suggests that any progress made in the NHS at the time was due to increased funding and wider reforms rather than the merger itself, and highlights how combining the roles contributed to governance challenges such as overspending. The piece emphasises that both positions are individually large and complex—covering NHS operations, social care, public health, and wider government responsibilities—and combining them risks weakening oversight and performance, reducing operational independence, and overburdening leadership, ultimately arguing the roles should remain separate. 
  • Waiting matters: bringing down NHS waiting lists is important but so is the experience of waiting [9/6].  
  • This blog highlights that while NHS waiting lists in England are beginning to fall and performance against targets has improved, patients’ experiences of waiting remain poor, with many facing uncertainty, lack of communication and little information about their care. Survey findings show large proportions of patients who do not know when they will be treated, receive no updates after referral, or feel dissatisfied with communication, leading to anxiety and frustration. The piece argues that reducing waiting times alone is not enough—improving communication, providing regular updates and ensuring patients feel informed and supported are equally critical to delivering a better overall experience and avoiding harm within the system 
  • Tackling recruitment in adult social care – time for a different conversation [9/6].  
  • This blog argues that while adult social care workforce numbers are improving and vacancies are falling, this masks a fragile reliance on international recruitment and a decline in domestic workers. It highlights that, despite extensive research identifying factors affecting recruitment—such as low pay, public perceptions, and complex entry routes—there is limited robust evidence on which interventions actually work to improve hiring. The sector’s fragmentation, with many small providers lacking resources to adopt strategic recruitment approaches, further limits progress and the sharing of best practice. The piece concludes that improving recruitment will require stronger evidence, better evaluation of policies, more coordinated action across providers, and greater leadership from government to support long-term solutions. 

The Health Foundation 

  • Failure demand: the hidden work holding back NHS productivity [12/6].  
  • This blog argues that much NHS activity is driven by “failure demand” – avoidable work created when the system fails to meet patients’ needs effectively the first time, leading to chasing, duplication, delays and poor coordination. It highlights common causes such as operational inefficiencies, rigid rules, backlogs and fragmented care for complex patients, all of which generate unnecessary workload and reduce productivity. The piece suggests that improving NHS productivity will depend not just on increasing activity, but on reducing lowvalue or avoidable care, better coordinating services, measuring outcomes more effectively, and giving staff greater flexibility to solve underlying problems in care pathways. 

Ipsos 

  • Public Knowledge of Blood Types Low in Great Britain [12/6].  
  • An Ipsos survey finds that public knowledge of blood types in Great Britain is low, with many people unaware of their own blood group or basic facts about blood compatibility, despite its importance for safe transfusions and emergencies. The research highlights gaps in understanding across the population and suggests this lack of awareness could have implications for patient safety and blood donation efforts, underlining the need for better public education about blood types and their role in healthcare. 
    • Knowledge of blood type: More than half of Britons, 5 in 10 (56%), report that they do not know what their own blood type is based on standard categorisations (such as AB+, A-, or O+), while 4 in 10 (44%) state that they do know it. 
    • Donation history: Roughly 1 in 3 British adults (32%) say they have ever donated or given blood. 

General Medical Council 

London Trusts    

Barts Health NHS Trust 

 Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust